Free Basics, launched in Egypt in October, is aimed at low-income customers, allowing anyone with a cheap computer or smartphone to create a Facebook account and access a limited set of Internet services at no charge.
Egypt blocked Facebook Inc's Free Basics
Internet service at the end of last year after the U.S. company refused
to give the Egyptian government the ability to spy on users, two people
familiar with the matter said.
Free Basics,
launched in Egypt in October, is aimed at low-income customers, allowing
anyone with a cheap computer or smartphone to create a Facebook account
and access a limited set of Internet services at no charge.
The Egyptian government suspended the service on Dec. 30 and said at the time that the mobile carrier Etisalat had only been granted a temporary permit to offer the service for two months.
Two
sources with direct knowledge of discussions between Facebook and the
Egyptian government said Free Basics was blocked because the company
would not allow the government to circumvent the service's security to
conduct surveillance. They declined to say exactly what type of access
the government had demanded or what practices it wanted Facebook to
change.
A spokesman for Facebook declined to comment. Etisalat did not respond to a request for comment.
Mohamed Hanafi,
a spokesman for Egypt's Ministry of Communication, declined to comment
specifically on the allegation about surveillance demands but cited
other reasons for Free Basics to be blocked.
"The
service was offered free of charge to the consumer, and the national
telecommunication regulator saw the service as harmful to companies and
their competitors," he said.
Free Basics,
which is available in 37 countries that have large populations without
reliable Internet service, is central to Facebook's global strategy. The
company does not sell ads on the Free Basics version of its website and
app, but it aims to reach a large group of potential users who
otherwise would not be able to create Facebook accounts.
Facebook
said more than 3 million Egyptians used the service before it was
suspended, and 1 million of them had never had Internet access. The main
Facebook site and app are still available in Egypt, which has a
population of about 90 million.
The conflict over
Free Basics highlights the delicate balancing act that global Internet
companies face in responding to the demands of governments while
protecting the privacy of their customers, especially at a time of
heightened concerns about Internet surveillance and censorship
worldwide.
It represents one of the few known
cases in which a global Internet company has received and rejected a
government demand for special access to its network and been forced to
shut down a service, Internet privacy experts say.
Free
Basics has come under fire from Internet activists across the globe,
most notably in India, for violating net neutrality by allowing free
access to a select group of websites and businesses, thus putting others
at a disadvantage.
Indian regulators issued new
rules in February that effectively barred Free Basics after a two-month
public consultation process.
Hanafi cited the
India example in explaining Egypt's move, but there has been no public
debate or regulatory proceeding over net neutrality or the competitive
impact of Free Basics in Egypt.
STRONGER SECURITY
Facebook
in September strengthened the security protections for Free Basics
after criticism from privacy advocates that it did not do enough to
prevent spying. In part, the problem was that users could not seamlessly
connect over encrypted channels to the secure websites marked by
addresses beginning HTTPS.
That meant that
customers using web-based email might have their messages exposed.
Authorities might also be able to watch who was visiting particular
websites.
Now, those using the Free Basics mobile
app can connect directly with encryption to secure sites. Those
connecting via the Free Basics website can connect securely to Facebook,
which decrypts and then re-encrypts user traffic before sending it
along to partner sites.
It is not known whether
the new security measures were a factor in Egypt's decision to block
Free Basics. It is also not known if the government has asked other
social media companies or Internet service providers for security back
doors.
When Free Basics launched in Egypt, there
was no mention of a temporary permit or concerns about competition or
net neutrality, according to people who were involved in the
discussions.
At the time of the suspension, Facebook said it was "disappointed" and hoped to "resolve (the) situation soon."
Some former Facebook employees said the company has reason to be especially vigilant in defending its customers in Egypt.
A
Facebook page started in 2010 by a Google employee in Dubai about the
death of an Alexandria man at the hands of police played a direct role
in fomenting the protests that toppled autocrat Hosni Mubarak in 2011.
In
January this year, amid a crackdown on dissent in the run-up to the
fifth anniversary of the uprising, Egyptian security forces arrested two
people for managing Facebook pages that they said were used to support
the outlawed Muslim Brotherhood and encourage protest.
The two are still in jail pending investigations on charges of inciting violence and disseminating and publishing false news.
Any move to shut down Facebook completely in Egypt would likely bring a harsh popular backlash, said Ramy Raoof,
a digital security researcher and consultant. But blocking Free Basics
can crimp Facebook's growth among lower income people, without
alienating middle-class Internet users and businesses.
"Shutting down Facebook completely is an idea that is far-fetched and would lead to great consequences," Raoof said.
No comments:
Post a Comment